In the network economy era, the impact of network externalities on consumers’ new product purchase intention is increasingly significant. However, there is little empirical researches to explore the relationship between these two constructs. This research utilizes the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and combines it with perceived risk theory analyzing the relationship between perceived network externalities and new product purchase intention. The results of our empirical study show direct and indirect relationship. The perceived network externalities can influence consumers’ new product purchase intention directly. In addition, they have an indirect impact by influencing the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risk.
Cite this paper
|||Lazarus, R.S. (1996) Cognition and Motivation in Emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352.
|||Economides, N. (1999) The Economics of Networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 673-699.
|||Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L., et al. (1999) Examining The Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 91-112.|
|||Davis, F.D. (1986) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.|
|||Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-technology Fit Constructs. Information & Management, 36.|
|||Bauer, R.A. (1960) Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. In: Hancock, R.S., Ed., Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Proceedings of the 43rd. Conference of the American Marketing Association, 389-398.|
|||Cunningham, S.M. (1967) The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk. Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, 82-108.|
|||Stone, R.N. and Gronhaug, K. (1993) Pereeived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27, 39-50.
|||Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. (1985) Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75, 424-440.|
|||Wang, C.C., Hsu, Y.H. and Fang, W.C. (2004) Acceptance of Technology with Network Externalities: An Empirical Study of Internet Instant Messaging Services. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6, 15-28.|
|||Featherman, M.S. and Pavlou, P.A. (2003) Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Fakes Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 451-474.
|||Lu, H.P., Hsu, C.L. and Hsu, H.Y. (2005) An Empirical Study of the Effect of Perceived Risk upon Intention to Use Online Applications. Information Management & Computer Security, 13, 106-120.
|||Vijayasarathy, L.R. and Jones, J.M. (2000) Print and Internet Catalog Shopping: Assessing Attitudes and Intentions. Internet Research, 10, 191-202.
|||Schilling, M.A. (2002) Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing and Network Externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 387-398.
|||Bental, B. and Spiegel, M. (1995) Network Competition, Product Quality and Market Coverage in the Presence of Network Externalities. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 43, 197-208.
|||Padmanabhan, V., Rajiv, S. and Srinivasan, K. (1997) New Products, Upgrades, and New Releases: A Rationale for Sequential Product Introduction. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 456-72.
|||Deng, C., Lu, Y. and Zhang, J. (2007) Study on Mobile Services Using Behavior on the Base of TAM and Network Externalities. Journal of management, 4, 216-221.|
|||Hung, S.Y., Ku, C.Y. and Chang, C.M. (2003) Critical Factors of WAP Services Adoption: An Empirical Study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 42-60.